Abstract
The reproductive fitness of cyanobacteria is altered by variation of temperature conditions and differential mutation of Kai genes that contribute to circadian rhythms. The degree and significance of these effects were tested in three distinct strains of Synechococcus elongatus cyanobacteria: a wild-type strain (AMC149) and two mutated strains with either an optimized or a disrupted circadian rhythm. These strains were allowed to compete in mixed cultures to determine the adaptive value of circadian clocks in relation to the reproductive fitness of cyanobacteria. Pure cultures served as controls, ensuring that growth rates were the same. Results illustrate that under constant light conditions at high temperatures, the strains with mutant circadian rhythms were both more reproductively fit than the wild-type strain. In conclusion, we found that circadian clocks do not confer a reproductive advantage for cyanobacteria when the cycle of the circadian clock does not match the light/dark cycle of the environment.Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to Vanderbilt Undergraduate Research Journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (linked here). By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are available for wide dissemination at no cost to readers, with proper attribution (acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal), in educational and other non-commercial settings. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. However, for undergraduates authoring a manuscript under the guidance of a faculty member or research mentor, we strongly encourage the student to discuss with the faculty mentor and the Editor if prior publication in the Vanderbilt Undergraduate Research Journal will constrain future publication efforts in professional journals. To this end, all authors must submit a signed mentor consent form at the time of submission..